d_ab345133

SOFT

2026-08-08 10:30:48 UTC · partner demo · threshold profile balanced · source live

Straja's model only ever saw what's listed below — never a name, an account ID, or anything else that could identify who this was. That's how the system is built, not just a policy someone promised to follow.

Reasoning

Session behavior looks self-directed — address typed by hand, no long idle gaps, only two tab switches, no declines or KYC retries — so there's no sign of someone being walked through this in real time. What warrants a single context screen is that a well-established account is sending 6x its usual amount into a contract first seen one day ago and moving it out within 15 minutes, which fits a risky-but-informed decision (new protocol or presale) rather than a coached one.

amount_vs_median 6x + destination_first_seen_days 1 (new contract)typed address, idle_gaps 0, no escalation

Signal vector, as received

Signal	Value	Contributed
account_age_days	180	—
is_first_purchase	false	—
amount_eur	6000	—
amount_vs_median	6	yes
funding_method	bank_transfer	—
minutes_to_outbound	15	—
destination_first_seen_days	1	yes
destination_type	contract	—
declined_attempts	0	—
address_entry_method	typed	—
idle_gaps_over_60s	0	—
tab_switches	2	—
deposit_escalation	[6000]	—
kyc_retries	0	—
merchant_verified	null	—

Amount

€6,000

User outcome

Not recorded

Model

claude-opus-5

Prompt fingerprint

pattern:03f286e3e72b probe:8f9e2db8c06c verdict:2aaed03b60a9