DEMOflow/L1 (PASS)flow/S1 (INTERVENE)flow/S7 (SOFT)partner/decisionspartner/compliancex402-demo (agent pays)
RECORDED DEMO — every verdict, question and pattern screen here is real Claude Opus 5 output from live sessions, replayed. Nothing is generated as you click. Ask for a live pilot to see it scoring in real time. Recorded 12 September 2026.

d_b12dbad0

PASS

2026-08-07 09:20:57 UTC · partner demo · threshold profile balanced · source live

Straja's model only ever saw what's listed below — never a name, an account ID, or anything else that could identify who this was. That's how the system is built, not just a policy someone promised to follow.

Reasoning

Flat repeated deposits and quick outbound would matter if the destination were a brand-new wallet, but this settles to a known exchange address the account has used for over a year, and the amount is right at the account's own median. Session is fluent and unassisted with no coordination signals, so this reads as routine recurring transfer activity.

destination_type known_exchange + destination_first_seen_days 390idle_gaps_over_60s 0 + tab_switches 0 + typed addressamount_vs_median 1account_age_days 420

Signal vector, as received

SignalValueContributed
account_age_days420yes
is_first_purchasefalse—
amount_eur18000—
amount_vs_median1yes
funding_methodbank_transfer—
minutes_to_outbound10—
destination_first_seen_days390yes
destination_typeknown_exchangeyes
declined_attempts0—
address_entry_methodtyped—
idle_gaps_over_60s0yes
tab_switches0yes
deposit_escalation[17500, 18200, 18000]—
kyc_retries0—
merchant_verifiednull—
Amount
€18,000
User outcome
Not recorded
Model
claude-opus-5
Prompt fingerprint
pattern:03f286e3e72b probe:8f9e2db8c06c verdict:2aaed03b60a9